You’re protesting against corrupt foreigners
doing something you believe is seriously wrong, yet are shocked when they treat
you harshly?
It doesn’t matter how strongly you
believe in the righteousness of your cause, there’s a balance between the ideal
of freedom of speech and the practical, common sense of knowing where it is and
is not respected. If you’re going to protest in countries without the
protection of Western style legal institutions, you need to be aware of and
prepared for the consequences. I don’t believe many middle class, Western
activists are as prepared for martyrdom as they think they are.
What strikes me most about the
Greenpeace protesters arrested in Russia is their naivety. The captain of the Greenpeace ship Arctic
Sunrise is saying that he and his fellow activists “remain in shock at their
treatment”.
Why? Seriously, what did you think
would happen if you boarded a Russian oil rig, particularly if there were
divers working below the surface, as the Russians claim? You didn’t consider
that you might be genuinely endangering people you couldn’t see, did you? Just
sail up in your boat, hang your banner, take some footage and call yourselves
eco warriors.
The collective delusion of
supposedly educated adults that they can travel to a foreign country, with a
repressive, authoritarian government, protest in whatever manner they deem fit,
then express shock when they are not treated as they would be back home beggars
belief.
Protester and glorified uni student
Alex Harris, 27, says:
“They want to come across as a modern country but they are
not. Not the way they treat people, not with their human rights issues. It's a
country that doesn't tolerate much and you have to be really careful.”
Umm … der! Did you only figure this
out after your arrest? If you knew beforehand, you’re either very committed to
political martyrdom or very stupid. If not, you’re a child.
Given her musing on what she missed
while in prison, I’d suggest the latter:
“Walking along Manly to Shelly Beach and back, going for a
coffee and people-watching. I also really missed riding my bike to work and
catching the ferry.”
A serious adult would have decried
the way all prisoners are treated in Russia,
discussed its use of excessive, politically motivated charges to repress
dissent, then stayed on message about oil drilling in the Arctic.
Instead, she’s prattling on about herself and how she missed her comfortable,
sunshine filled, privileged life.
It smacks of the lightweight, middle
class militancy which is the stock of many Greenpeace and similar activists.
“We sailed to the Arctic
and hung a banner on their oil rig. It was on the news, did you see? I met
loads of really great people and saw some really cool scenery. Check out my
photos on Instagram.”
They sincerely believe in the cause,
but their mode of protest is primarily cover for a big adventure, largely
funded by other people. It’s as much about them playing eco heroes as it is
about the cause.
The Arctic Sunrise protesters seemed
to think that at worst, they’d be detained and deported. Upon their return
home, they’d be interviewed by a few journalists and have a good story to tell
all their activist mates. They’d be interesting and popular.
Of course the charges of piracy and
hooliganism were grossly excessive. But that happens all the time in countries like
Russia.
Actually, in pretty much every non-Western country on Earth.
Despite the fall of communism, Russia’s legal
institutions bear little resemblance to Western ones. It has an authoritarian,
essentially fascist government. There is no meaningful separation of the police
and judiciary from this government. In fact, it was probably this lack of
separation which caused the protesters to be freed, ultimately without charge. The matter remaining unresolved during the Sochi
Winter Olympics would have caused Russia too many diplomatic
problems.
I ask this in all seriousness: How
could the Greenpeace protesters not have anticipated a very stern response from
the Russian government? Did they think it would be like being arrested in France or Spain? Would they have dared try
something similar in China?
Were they really so naïve as to believe Russia
is more like Western Europe than like China because it is run by white
people? Or did they believe moral force and international law would curtail the
Russians’ response?
The crew would all have been
familiar with the jailing of Pussy Riot on similarly excessive charges. What did you think, that the
Russians only treat their own citizens that way? They wouldn’t dare do it to
Westerners? Yet you all probably rail against cultural imperialism (until you
need it).
Naivety appears widespread among the
crew of the Arctic Sunrise. Canadian Paul Ruzycki’s view of the piracy charges
was:
"It was an overblown charge, and there's no way
Greenpeace would ever be convicted of being pirates."
Not in a Western legal system. But
in Russia,
I wouldn’t bet a few years of my life on it. Their legal system still has many
elements remaining from the communist era. Bogus convictions on politically
motivated charges is one of them.
By the way, this is a grown man
making these comments, puffed up with righteous indignation, ideology and
international law. Ruzycki’s take on Russian commandos boarding their ship was:
“They knew we were Greenpeace … they just used intimidation
techniques to frighten us and get us to do what they were telling us to do.”
You thought arguing with them might
have been possible? Telling them their drilling operation is illegal under
international law? Did you think they would ask you all to transfer to their
ship to be interviewed and deported? Did you think refusal to comply might have
been an option?
The rough treatment was also
intended as an example to other Westerners who might get similar ideas. The
Russians have used this as an opportunity to let Western activists and their
governments know they don’t care what we think. Russia is nuclear armed, runs a
massive trade surplus, has enormous mineral wealth and with global warming, its
agricultural production is actually increasing, so there are really few levers
Western governments can pull if their citizens are detained and mistreated.
One person who does have cause for
complaint is Australian Colin Russell. He was held in detention for some time after the other 29 protesters had been
released on bail. It’s all very well for Julie Bishop to say that she “had
personally written to the Russian foreign minister”. I’m not doubting she did.
It probably helped. However, why did the Australian government not make the
strongest diplomatic representations immediately upon learning that one of our
citizens was being singled out for special treatment? We still do not know the
reason.
Australian governments have long had
a very poor record of assisting our citizens caught up in corrupt, foreign
legal systems. The cases of Jock Palfreeman in Bulgaria
and Kerry & Kay Danes in Laos are salient examples.
Given this, it is the most naïve
stupidity for Alex Harris to contemplate returning to Russia to protest further during the
Winter Olympics. I believe she’s actually a British citizen, but that won’t
help her: the last British Prime Minister with any balls was Margaret Thatcher.
The only thing which will save her
is that she won’t get across the border.
The deluded plans of some of the
activists to return to Russia
for further protests are exactly what Australia’s foreign minister, Julie
Bishop is talking about when she raised the possibility of Australians who “acted recklessly or deliberately
acted against the laws of another country” being made to contribute to the cost
of consular support or extraction.
Fair enough. Political protest is
not a job, even though some seem to think it is. The Australian taxpayers have
not employed Greenpeace to protest against Russian oil drilling. We shouldn’t
foot the bill when naïve idealists deliberately get themselves into trouble in
a foreign country, despite explicit warnings. Greenpeace can pay. That might
force them to plan more adult protests, as opposed to adventure holidays for
glorified uni students.
No comments:
Post a Comment