In what
insane society could someone who accidentally sent sexually explicit text
messages to his entire contact list instead of just his girlfriend even be
charged with a criminal offence, let alone jailed for it?
A prudish,
“sexual morality” obsessed Muslim state like Saudi
Arabia or Malaysia?
The authoritarian and equally prudish Singapore? A communist state
waiting for the opportunity to persecute a dissident?
No … modern Britain.
The fount of Liberalism.
This is
precisely the fate which befell 24 year old Craig Evans, who was sentenced to 18 months jail in Birmingham.
How could this be, you might well ask?
He is a
swimming teacher. As such, amongst his contacts were a 13 and a 14 year old
girl. The explicit text also found its way to them and so some idiot copper
consequently decided to charge him with inciting a child to engage in sexual
activity.
Surely
incitement must require intent. How could there be such an act as negligent
incitement?
Which idiot(s)
at the CPS allowed this case to proceed? They should be named and required to
publicly justify their actions to the citizens they serve.
Why didn't
the original judge throw the case out?
Why did the
appeal judges not quash the sentence altogether? Instead, they simply reduced
the sentence to nine months, wholly suspended. Craig Evans still has a
conviction for a sexual offence against children. He will be on a sexual
offenders’ register for the rest of his life. His career is destroyed, as he
will never be able to work with children again.
For what? A
mistake using his mobile phone. There is nothing more sinister here: the
offending message was sent to his entire
contact list, including his parents. It was clearly accidental.
How does
this farce in any way represent justice? Would any of the people involved, who
allegedly represent the justice system, have lost a wink of sleep?
Of course
not. They will all keep plodding along, moronically ruining more people’s lives
as they go.
That Craig
Evans was even charged at all is a travesty. His life has effectively been
ruined. He should be able to sue for wrongful prosecution and defamation. The
police who laid the charge, the CPS prosecutors who pursued it and the judge
who sentenced him should all be sacked. How can such people possibly be trusted
in positions where they have the power to destroy lives with accusations?
It is a good
example of the justice system being taken over by morons and mindless
bureaucrats. The separation of the powers of parliament, the judiciary and the
executive is a long and deeply held principle in Western democracies. However
it is being destroyed in the country of its origin as the police, CPS and
judiciary become infected with the disease of nanny state politics.
This is not
simply an occasional perverse outcome from badly framed legislation in a blind
justice system: it is tyranny.
We usually
think of tyranny in the organized form of the totalitarian police states of the
communists or Nazis or Robespierre’s Republic. But tyranny is usually not so well organized. In modern, Western
societies, it is arising via the correlation of the actions of hand wringing
nanny staters and social democratic ideologues, mindless bureaucrats, arse
covering jobsworths and cynical, careerist politicians, all aided by
interconnected databases and lazy media.
This is the
tyranny which charged and convicted Craig Evans. No Stalin, Hitler or
Robespierre signing death warrants. Not even a hegemonic conspiracy. Just
gutless, mindless stupidity, flowing from one idiot to the next within a
channel of either ideologically based or fearful, reactionary legislation, all
incompetently written.
In the
police states of the Communist era, had a man been falsely accused of a child
sex offence on a spurious construction and interpretation of “facts”, most
people would not have believed it. It would have been done as a warning to
dissidents or vindictively as a result of a personal dispute. The prosecution
would have been seen as an act of raw political power. This enemy is known and
does not even attempt to hide itself; in fact, it makes itself known at every
opportunity.
But in Craig
Evans’ case, the enemy is not a unified, coherent entity: it is the combination
of the above mentioned nanny staters, bureaucrats and careerists with the fear,
apathy and stupidity of the citizens who could organize and vote this crap out,
but don’t bother.
Who will
fight to clear Craig Evans’ name … to have his conviction overturned, his name
removed from the various databases and the media print the story of his
innocence such that a significant proportion of people will actually read it?
Very few
could be bothered … too busy with job and family. Life’s pretty tough these
days, you know. The lumpen middle class not even realizing that his struggle is
their struggle.
In some
ways, that tyranny is more terrifying, because we are fighting the willful
ignorance within. People pretend it’s not really happening because the
alternative is to admit to themselves that they are regularly presented with
the opportunity to remove the enemy at the ballot box, yet consistently fail to
take it.
Instead,
they pretend that the tyranny does not exist: it is a fantasy of conspiracy
theorists, Tea Party reactionaries or
redneck racists.
TYRANNY DOES
NOT REQUIRE A LARGE SCALE CONSPIRACY.
Human societies are complex, self
organizing systems. That self organization is not always directed or even
initially evident. Tyranny can arise via the unwitting, but persistent
correlation of the actions of various people or groups who have different
motives. All it takes to become established is for no-one else to organize to
stop it.
And what of the people who report this to the authorities? Surely there was conversation between them and the swim coach before running off and reporting this heinous crime. Yes they have every right to be upset but running straight to police is just as disappointing as the police response. Fingo should have some fury for these wowsers.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely right, Resches.
DeleteAt a guess, it would have been the girls' parents.
They probably took it straight to the police without even contacting Craig Evans and asking for an explanation. Then he was just in the mindless machine of the legal process.
The people who brought the matter to the police are precisely the types whose ovine fearfulness allows the nanny state to take root and flourish. Exactly the people De Tocqueville was talking about.
There will be some bullshit provision against naming the parents and publicly holding them to account because that would also identify the child "victims".